Prior Art Analysis for a Unique Pain Relief Cream: A Detailed Case Study
A comprehensive examination of patentability for an innovative pain relief formulation with unique ingredient combinations.
Executive Summary
Patentability Study
This case study examines Prior Art Analysis for patentability of a pain relief cream based on a prior art search and analysis. The study, titled "Patentability – Pain Relief Cream," investigates the novelty and non-obviousness of the cream's specific combination of ingredients.
Key Findings
The analysis revealed unique combinations of natural ingredients, particularly the inclusion of rare components, which were not found in prior art either individually or in combination for pain relief applications.
Client Challenge
Determination of patentability of the specific ingredient combination
Requirement for comprehensive prior art analysis to support patent application
Methodology
Search Parameters
- CPC Classifications focused on ointments
- Keywords related to pain relief compositions
- Specific ingredient combinations
Non-Patent Literature
Scientific papers and market research
Commercial Product Analysis
Existing pain relief creams in the market
Search Scope
Multiple Jurisdictions
Patent search across multiple jurisdictions
Patent Documents
Analysis of 864 potentially relevant patent documents
Market Products
Review of existing market products
Scientific Literature
Scientific literature review
Key Findings
Patents
Seven closest prior art documents identified
Market Products
Six similar products analyzed
Scientific Literature
Key research papers reviewed, including specific studies on Daphne species
Feature Matrix
A feature matrix was created to illustrate the overlap between the "Pain Relief Cream" ingredients and those disclosed in the closest identified patent results. The matrix compares the presence of each ingredient in the Pain Relief Cream against several patents, including Wittmayer ( WO2023225143A1), Orie et al. (CN108883049B), Xin (CN115645504A), Marques et al. (BR102012016205A2), Jinke et al. (CN117224592A), Baptiste et al. (CN110149795B), and Chao (CN106852841A).
The matrix reveals that none of the identified patents disclose a combination of all the ingredients found in "Pain Relief Cream". For example, Wittmayer discloses some overlaping ingredients, but not the other ingredeints. Same is the case with other patents.
Novelty and Non-Obviousness
Unique Combination
Novel formulation not found in prior art
Non-Obvious Ingredients
Specific ingredients not suggested for pain relief
Unique Selling Point
Distinctive formulation creates market advantage
The study argues that even if a person skilled in the art were to combine some of the ingredients, the combination of some of the Ingredeints in the client's Pain Relief Cream would not be obvious, as these ingredients are not suggested for pain relief composition. This specific combination is considered the unique selling point (USP) of the product.
Market Products and Non-Patent Literature
Market Products
The review of market products revealed that none use the specific ingredient set of "Pain Relief Cream." Instead, they use ingredients like Lidocaine, apricot/grape/hemp oils, etc., as active ingredients.
Scientific Literature
Research articles primarily discuss commonly known pain relief ingredients like clove, horse chestnut, and licorice. While Moshiashvili highlights the anti-inflammatory properties of different Daphne species, including one in client's formulation, no papers suggest using two main ingredeints from client's formulation for pain relief.
Analysis Outcome
Novelty
Confirmed – unique combination not found in prior art
Non-obviousness
Supported by the absence of suggestions to combine the specific ingredients
Industrial Applicability
Clear application in pain relief sector
Supporting Evidence
2
Feature Matrix
Showing no complete overlap with existing patents
2
Market Analysis
Demonstrating distinct formulation from competitors
Scientific Literature
Supporting individual ingredient efficacy
Value Delivered
100%
Patentability Assessment
Clear and comprehensive evaluation
864+
Documents Analyzed
Thorough prior art search
7
Key Prior Art Documents
Identified and analyzed in detail
6
Market Products Reviewed
Competitive landscape assessment
Strategic Recommendations
Proceed with patent application
Based on strong patentability assessment
Focus on the unique combination in claims
Emphasize specific formulation details
Emphasize the novel ingredients in patent strategy
Highlight rare components as key differentiators
Methodology Highlights
Systematic search strategy
Structured approach to finding relevant prior art
Comprehensive database coverage
Multiple patent and literature databases searched
Multi-faceted analysis approach
Patents, products, and literature examined
Thorough documentation
Detailed recording of all findings
Conclusion
Our analysis has identified several key strengths supporting this product's patentability potential.
Patentability Support
Unique ingredient combination with novel components
Comprehensive Foundation
Solid analysis base for patent application strategy
Unique Formulation
Novel product with strong patent protection potential
The Pain Relief Cream formulation stands out primarily due to its unique combination of ingredients not previously used together in pain relief compositions, creating a distinctive opportunity in the market.
Navigation